Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Gurpreet Luthra

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Gurpreet Luthra

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Panel
titleColorWhite
titleBGColor#1FA5A0
titleNational Library of Medicine

Title: Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems for Low-Resource Settings: Systematic Review (National Library of Medicine, 2017)

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703976/

Brief: This report provides a systematic review of 5 selected EHRs across 21 dimensions such as InterOp, Ease of Use, Coding System, Custom Forms/Reports, Access Control, Flexible Data Model, Offline Support, etc:

  1. GNU Health,
  2. OpenEMR,
  3. FreeMED,
  4. OpenMRS, and
  5. Bahmni.

Bahmni scored very high across most dimensions. A referenced document by the same authors explains their choice of using Bahmni (which is built on top of OpenMRS & OpenELIS) here: Customization of OpenMRS for the LEISHMANIASIS Research and Treatment Centre in Ethiopia (pdf link)

Funding: This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 642609.