Title: Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems for Low-Resource Settings: Systematic Review (National Library of Medicine, 2017)
Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703976/
Brief: This report provides a systematic review of 5 selected EHRs across 21 dimensions such as InterOp, Ease of Use, Coding System, Custom Forms/Reports, Access Control, Flexible Data Model, Offline Support, etc:
- GNU Health,
- OpenEMR,
- FreeMED,
- OpenMRS, and
- Bahmni.
Bahmni scored very high across most dimensions. A referenced document by the same authors explains their choice of using Bahmni (which is built on top of OpenMRS & OpenELIS) here: Customization of OpenMRS for the LEISHMANIASIS Research and Treatment Centre in Ethiopia (pdf link)
Funding: This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 642609.